Today I shot Mom an email saying that I mentioned that phone call in the announcement I made on the JPG blog for issue 11 being out. She called shortly after, telling me “you’re so funny,” and that she thought that was cool that she was mentioned on the blog anecdotally.

It wasn’t until much later that I realized that this was the first time weblogs had come up in a conversation with my mother where I didn’t have to explain to her what they were.

Along the way, using weblogging software became de rigeur. There were some good reasons for this: permalinks, automatic archiving, being able to update from any computer online with a web browser instead of getting over to your webserver somehow. The push for these applications to do more started making them gradually more complicated: posts came with titles, then “more” links, then comments, then trackbacks, then tags and categories, then RSS feeds…

And all this was great, but a hobby which started as people just sharing links with only a minimal amount of description (or more, sometimes, but not by default) were suddenly becoming more like something else that had been around for just as long if not longer: journals. And then there was some sort of journal-form vs. e/n-form, and then somehow weblogging drifted towards longer-form articles and essays. They evolved into something else, basically. Like you do.

Somehow I’m wondering if a lot of webloggers shifted their forms because they thought they had to, rather than because they’d want to. I once read about a study (and I can’t link to it because I can’t find it, because the key words to search on are too generic, so if you can find it, let me know and I’ll link it up) where people were given a task to perform, and either a handful of tools or a couple dozen tools. The ones given a small amount of tools picked the best one or two for the job and went at it, but the ones given a plethora to choose from somehow got caught up in the notion that they had to use as many tools as possible in their task. A multitude of options could be too much in some cases, making things more complicated.

I kind of see how this idea could get people a little anxious about recreating that simple, old-style weblogging: the tools we have are overly-complicated for something quick and dirty. If you just wanted to post “Check it, Gothic Martha Stewart, neat,” these days I’d have to either open up WordPress in a browser, write it, come up with a title, categorize it, and post it. Alternately, I could post it to delicious or another bookmarks manager, and set it up to post my annotated links once a day to my regular weblog. Either way, that’s a lot of work for “check it.”

This is why I’m really digging Tumblr. It’s a new service that lets you keep what was dubbed a tumblelog somewhere in 2005, which seems to me a lot like that old-style weblogging, but of course better. A tumblelog isn’t so much about personality and exposition, but about tidbits and small amounts of content. Tumblr lets you post in different ways (regular posts, photos, quotes, links, conversations and video), and each type gives you two and only two fields to fill out, with one field being optional. It is stupid-simple. With this, you can be all “Okay, I have this thing I want to put up!….Okay, it’s up!” There’s also the bookmarklet you can use to post, and it’s smartly written. If you’re on a YouTube video, it’ll assume you mean to share that YouTube video. If you have text highlighted, it’ll set it up in a quotation post. Just on a page? It’ll set it up as a link. Wonderful.

I really like this random-seeming style of posting and quoting. Even if you don’t post any regular posts, your personality will come through over time via the kind of content you share. And the conversation posts are my favorite, of course, seeing as I used to do this with the chatter category on Somnolent.org and Over Queersville. You do a modicum of text formatting on your end, submit, and they process it all nice and pretty-like. Rad.

Tumblr is in active development and they’re adding new features pretty regularly so far (most recently: feeding your feed from anything into your tumblelog and having it format it as a given type of post that you specify), you can go with a default template and color it or roll your own template, and it’s all free. Right now you can’t leave comments on posts, and I sort of hope they leave it that way, but I guess I can always turn my comments off if they make it happen.

One criticism I’ve heard is the expected one: do we need another weblogging tool? Sure, why not? As long as we have different types of content to post and ways to present that content, we’ll have room for different tools to do it. And as they’ve said themselves:

Blogs are great, but they can be a lot of work. And they’re really built to handle longer-form text posts. Tumblelogs, on the other hand, let you easily and quickly post and share anything you find or create.

For me, it’s like it’s 1999 all over again. Just… designed better, front to back. If I had known about proto-tumblelogs Projectionist and Anarchaia back when Over Queersville died, I might’ve tried to roll my own, or used someone’s software, or gone back to vi. Or, if Tumblr had been around, I might’ve jumped on it instead of wordpress.com—a fine tool, but heavy for what I was trying to do with jaschu’s record. Who needs context? Check it.

Stuff like this and the WYSIWYG Talent Show kind of bring weblogging full-circle for me. When I moved into Chicago from the burbs, I visited my poetry teacher from college and ended up showing her Running Tally, my original weblog, after she asked me if I was still writing poetry. (“Not so much, but I’m still writing, in a fashion, doing this thing on the web…”) She browsed through it and said, “What do you mean you’re not still writing poetry? What do you call this?” That same day, through her influence, I got booked to read at Grinder (now Homolatte) and started doing spoken word, writing stuff for the mic as well as the web. And now people are taking what they wrote for the web and are performing it as spoken word. Fantastic.

technorati tags:weblogs, spoken word, locus arts, lap-pop